Papers › Using theory-driven Integrated Population Models to evaluate competitive outcomes in...
Using theory-driven Integrated Population Models to evaluate competitive outcomes in stage-structured systems
Matthieu Paquet, Frédéric Barraquand
Predicting competitive outcomes typically requires fitting dynamical models to data, from which interaction strengths and coexistence indicators such as invasion criteria can be produced. Methods that allow to propagate parameter uncertainty are particularly indicated. These should ideally allow for competition between and within species at various life-stages, and make the best out of multiple data sources, each of which can be relatively scarce by statistical standards. Here, we embed a mathematical model of stage-structured competition between two species, producing analytical invasion criteria, into a two-species Integrated Population Model. The community-level IPM allows to combine counts, capture-recapture, and fecundity data into a single statistical framework, and the Bayesian formulation of the IPM fully propagates parameter uncertainty into invasion criteria. Model fitting demonstrates that we can correctly predict coexistence through reciprocal invasion when present, but that interaction strengths are not always estimable, depending on the prior chosen. Our competitive exclusion scenario is shown to be harder to identify, although our model allows to at least flag this scenario as uncertain rather than mistakenly present it as coexistence. Our results confirm the importance of accounting for uncertainty in the prediction of competitive outcomes.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections