Papers › USeR: A Web-based User Story eReviewer for Assisted Quality Optimizations
USeR: A Web-based User Story eReviewer for Assisted Quality Optimizations
Daniel Hallmann, Kerstin Jacob, Gerald Lüttgen, Ute Schmid, Rüdiger von der Weth
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
User stories are widely applied for conveying requirements within agile software development teams. Multiple user story quality guidelines exist, but authors like Product Owners in industry projects frequently fail to write high-quality user stories. This situation is exacerbated by the lack of tools for assessing user story quality. In this paper, we propose User Story eReviewer (USeR) a web-based tool that allows authors to determine and optimize user story quality. For developing USeR, we collected 77 potential quality metrics through literature review, practitioner sessions, and research group meetings and refined these to 34 applicable metrics through expert sessions. Finally, we derived algorithms for eight prioritized metrics using a literature review and research group meetings and implemented them with plain code and machine learning techniques. USeR offers a RESTful API and user interface for instant, consistent, and explainable user feedback supporting fast and easy quality optimizations. It has been empirically evaluated with an expert study using 100 user stories and four experts from two real-world agile software projects in the automotive and health sectors.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections