Papers › Diversity Helps: Unsupervised Few-shot Learning via Distribution Shift-based Data Augmentation
Diversity Helps: Unsupervised Few-shot Learning via Distribution Shift-based Data Augmentation
Tiexin Qin, Wenbin Li, Yinghuan Shi, Yang Gao
Few-shot learning aims to learn a new concept when only a few training examples are available, which has been extensively explored in recent years. However, most of the current works heavily rely on a large-scale labeled auxiliary set to train their models in an episodic-training paradigm. Such a kind of supervised setting basically limits the widespread use of few-shot learning algorithms. Instead, in this paper, we develop a novel framework called Unsupervised Few-shot Learning via Distribution Shift-based Data Augmentation (ULDA), which pays attention to the distribution diversity inside each constructed pretext few-shot task when using data augmentation. Importantly, we highlight the value and importance of the distribution diversity in the augmentation-based pretext few-shot tasks, which can effectively alleviate the overfitting problem and make the few-shot model learn more robust feature representations. In ULDA, we systemically investigate the effects of different augmentation techniques and propose to strengthen the distribution diversity (or difference) between the query set and support set in each few-shot task, by augmenting these two sets diversely (i.e., distribution shifting). In this way, even incorporated with simple augmentation techniques (e.g., random crop, color jittering, or rotation), our ULDA can produce a significant improvement. In the experiments, few-shot models learned by ULDA can achieve superior generalization performance and obtain state-of-the-art results in a variety of established few-shot learning tasks on Omniglot and miniImageNet. The source code is available in https://github.com/WonderSeven/ULDA.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2004.05805")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 13 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 13 have no recorded run.
By repository: official repository: 13 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
13 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 13 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from WonderSeven/ULDA. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
b7b4ce5261d43664 · report
a682370c88b559b3 · report
242d8f6ff665a8a0 · report
b1962bd997947f9b · report
e31cea644d08aaf3 · report
a861bdb57b1efb9a · report
f7c5285c241ce106 · report
c26bd451f1b4b267 · report
7702313c16b1182f · report
75c1b60e3bf0b372 · report
f1ac0078149b3155 · report
bb5c7b957820c064 · report
f347e7f86ec8d83d · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unsupervised Few-Shot Image Classification | Mini-Imagenet 5-way (1-shot) | ULDA | Accuracy | 40.71 | #24 of 28 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Unsupervised Few-Shot Image Classification | Mini-Imagenet 5-way (5-shot) | ULDA | Accuracy | 56.18 | #22 of 28 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Unsupervised Few-Shot Image Classification | Tiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot) | ULDA | Accuracy | 41.77 | #12 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Unsupervised Few-Shot Image Classification | Tiered ImageNet 5-way (5-shot) | ULDA | Accuracy | 56.78 | #12 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections