Papers › NatLan: Native Language Prompting Facilitates Knowledge Elicitation Through Language...

NatLan: Native Language Prompting Facilitates Knowledge Elicitation Through Language Trigger Provision and Domain Trigger Retention

7 Aug 2024arXiv:2408.03544archive 2025-07-28

Baixuan Li, Yunlong Fan, Tianyi Ma, Zhiqiang Gao

Multilingual large language models (MLLMs) do not perform as well when answering questions in non-dominant languages as they do in their dominant languages. Although existing translate-then-answer methods alleviate this issue, the mechanisms behind their effectiveness remain unclear. In this study, we analogize the dominant language of MLLMs to the native language of humans and use two human cognitive features: the Language Trigger (LT) and the Domain Trigger (DT), to interpret the mechanisms behind translate-then-answer methods. This reveals that while sufficient LTs are provided by these methods, there remains a deficiency in DT retention. To mitigate this issue, we propose Native Language Prompting (NatLan), employing a Multi-MLLM collaboration strategy and introducing an additional role-enhanced domain-specific MLLM with stronger multilingual understanding capabilities as the translator. Across five language QA benchmarks, NatLan achieves up to a 31.28% improvement in accuracy and, compared to existing state-of-the-art methods, provides comparable or greater retention of DTs in up to 87% of cases. Our code is available at https://github.com/AnonyNLP/NatLan.

PaperPDFCode

Code

anonynlp/natlan officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Question Answering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections