Papers › University-1652: A Multi-view Multi-source Benchmark for Drone-based Geo-localization
University-1652: A Multi-view Multi-source Benchmark for Drone-based Geo-localization
Zhedong Zheng, Yunchao Wei, Yi Yang
We consider the problem of cross-view geo-localization. The primary challenge of this task is to learn the robust feature against large viewpoint changes. Existing benchmarks can help, but are limited in the number of viewpoints. Image pairs, containing two viewpoints, e.g., satellite and ground, are usually provided, which may compromise the feature learning. Besides phone cameras and satellites, in this paper, we argue that drones could serve as the third platform to deal with the geo-localization problem. In contrast to the traditional ground-view images, drone-view images meet fewer obstacles, e.g., trees, and could provide a comprehensive view when flying around the target place. To verify the effectiveness of the drone platform, we introduce a new multi-view multi-source benchmark for drone-based geo-localization, named University-1652. University-1652 contains data from three platforms, i.e., synthetic drones, satellites and ground cameras of 1,652 university buildings around the world. To our knowledge, University-1652 is the first drone-based geo-localization dataset and enables two new tasks, i.e., drone-view target localization and drone navigation. As the name implies, drone-view target localization intends to predict the location of the target place via drone-view images. On the other hand, given a satellite-view query image, drone navigation is to drive the drone to the area of interest in the query. We use this dataset to analyze a variety of off-the-shelf CNN features and propose a strong CNN baseline on this challenging dataset. The experiments show that University-1652 helps the model to learn the viewpoint-invariant features and also has good generalization ability in the real-world scenario.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2002.12186")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 15 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 14 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 15 samples from 2 repositories, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
15 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 14 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e324277ab874fc3a · report
53aa000deefe4aa4 · report
c1ca7e6cdc195426 · report
3f91b09177ddeb33 · report
7e50a19f3f7973ae · report
89cbd25ccde3f43c · report
0d6e985c6341bc25 · report
ae6281b1a572dfc8 · report
36a1160d7f36cda6 · report
e800290c5ea55efd · report
53ab69263a033c7a · report
4edba53421463c1a · report
002a30193332936f · report
1d92839d1dfa6815 · report
2875b342df8aa969 · report
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drone navigation | University-1652 | Instance Loss | AP | 58.74 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Drone navigation | University-1652 | Instance Loss | Recall@1 | 71.18 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Drone-view target localization | University-1652 | Instance Loss | AP | 63.13 | #11 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Drone-view target localization | University-1652 | Instance Loss | Recall@1 | 58.49 | #11 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image-Based Localization | cvusa | Instance Loss | Recall@1 | 43.91 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image-Based Localization | cvusa | Instance Loss | Recall@10 | 74.58 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image-Based Localization | cvusa | Instance Loss | Recall@5 | 66.38 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image-Based Localization | cvusa | Instance Loss | Recall@top1% | 91.78 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections