Papers › Universal Sentence Encoder
Universal Sentence Encoder
Daniel Cer, Yinfei Yang, Sheng-yi Kong, Nan Hua, Nicole Limtiaco, Rhomni St. John, Noah Constant, Mario Guajardo-Cespedes, Steve Yuan, Chris Tar, Yun-Hsuan Sung, Brian Strope, Ray Kurzweil
We present models for encoding sentences into embedding vectors that specifically target transfer learning to other NLP tasks. The models are efficient and result in accurate performance on diverse transfer tasks. Two variants of the encoding models allow for trade-offs between accuracy and compute resources. For both variants, we investigate and report the relationship between model complexity, resource consumption, the availability of transfer task training data, and task performance. Comparisons are made with baselines that use word level transfer learning via pretrained word embeddings as well as baselines do not use any transfer learning. We find that transfer learning using sentence embeddings tends to outperform word level transfer. With transfer learning via sentence embeddings, we observe surprisingly good performance with minimal amounts of supervised training data for a transfer task. We obtain encouraging results on Word Embedding Association Tests (WEAT) targeted at detecting model bias. Our pre-trained sentence encoding models are made freely available for download and on TF Hub.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1803.11175")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 22 code samples harvested from 7 repositories linked to this paper; 21 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 22 samples from 7 repositories, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
24 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
22 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 21 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 22 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 7 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
374645eab129b0a7 · report
062a676fc76590b0 · report
be6a5a54256a2e48 · report
09459e7e459b59bb · report
c8560729712489aa · report
57ed8fb06d18eb28 · report
b21be746b7a81ea3 · report
dc19d36ff15c170e · report
bdc6f530892a2385 · report
c04bf5d2161ebd3d · report
49ed3a1011829d57 · report
a720718390092b01 · report
d8a18a7be265eaa8 · report
06039e3720a58652 · report
46df1f9c4f68b7a2 · report
17f9e35850be5bb0 · report
718cc353bcf17057 · report
339439151f9ebe35 · report
cf60b388c921a1ae · report
bbef9b2638430ee8 · report
82e73a7356e05547 · report
4ad5869bd60d549c · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational Response Selection | PolyAI Reddit | USE | 1-of-100 Accuracy | 47.7% | #4 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Textual Similarity | STS Benchmark | USE_T | Pearson Correlation | 0.782 | #29 of 66 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | CR | USE_T+CNN (w2v w.e.) | Accuracy | 87.45 | #6 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | MPQA | USE_T+DAN (w2v w.e.) | Accuracy | 88.14 | #4 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | MR | USE_T+CNN | Accuracy | 81.59 | #9 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SST-2 Binary classification | USE_T+CNN (lrn w.e.) | Accuracy | 87.21 | #72 of 87 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Subjectivity Analysis | SUBJ | USE | Accuracy | 93.90 | #10 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text Classification | TREC-6 | USE_T+CNN | Error | 1.93 | #2 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections