Papers › Universal energy-accuracy tradeoffs in nonequilibrium cellular sensing
Universal energy-accuracy tradeoffs in nonequilibrium cellular sensing
S. E. Harvey, S. Lahiri, S. Ganguli
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We combine stochastic thermodynamics, large deviation theory, and information theory to derive fundamental limits on the accuracy with which single cell receptors can estimate external concentrations. As expected, if estimation is performed by an ideal observer of the entire trajectory of receptor states, then no energy consuming non-equilibrium receptor that can be divided into bound and unbound states can outperform an equilibrium two-state receptor. However, when estimation is performed by a simple observer that measures the fraction of time the receptor is bound, we derive a fundamental limit on the accuracy of general nonequilibrium receptors as a function of energy consumption. We further derive and exploit explicit formulas to numerically estimate a Pareto-optimal tradeoff between accuracy and energy. We find this tradeoff can be achieved by nonuniform ring receptors with a number of states that necessarily increases with energy. Our results yield a novel thermodynamic uncertainty relation for the time a physical system spends in a pool of states, and generalize the classic 1977 Berg-Purcell limit on cellular sensing along multiple dimensions.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections