Papers › On the complexity of the inverse Sturm-Liouville problem

On the complexity of the inverse Sturm-Liouville problem

24 Mar 2022arXiv:2203.13078links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Jonathan Ben-Artzi, Marco Marletta, Frank Rösler

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

This paper explores the complexity associated with solving the inverse Sturm-Liouville problem with Robin boundary conditions: given a sequence of eigenvalues and a sequence of norming constants, how many limits does a universal algorithm require to return the potential and boundary conditions? It is shown that if all but finitely many of the eigenvalues and norming constants coincide with those for the zero potential then the number of limits is zero, i.e. it is possible to retrieve the potential and boundary conditions precisely in finitely many steps. Otherwise, it is shown that this problem requires a single limit; moreover, if one has a priori control over how much the eigenvalues and norming constants differ from those of the zero-potential problem, and one knows that the average of the potential is zero, then the computation can be performed with complete error control. This is done in the spirit of the Solvability Complexity Index. All algorithms are provided explicitly along with numerical examples.

PaperPDFCode

Code

frank-roesler/inverse_sci officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections