Papers › Unified Image and Video Saliency Modeling

Unified Image and Video Saliency Modeling

11 Mar 2020ECCV 2020 8arXiv:2003.05477archive 2025-07-28

Richard Droste, Jianbo Jiao, J. Alison Noble

Visual saliency modeling for images and videos is treated as two independent tasks in recent computer vision literature. While image saliency modeling is a well-studied problem and progress on benchmarks like SALICON and MIT300 is slowing, video saliency models have shown rapid gains on the recent DHF1K benchmark. Here, we take a step back and ask: Can image and video saliency modeling be approached via a unified model, with mutual benefit? We identify different sources of domain shift between image and video saliency data and between different video saliency datasets as a key challenge for effective joint modelling. To address this we propose four novel domain adaptation techniques - Domain-Adaptive Priors, Domain-Adaptive Fusion, Domain-Adaptive Smoothing and Bypass-RNN - in addition to an improved formulation of learned Gaussian priors. We integrate these techniques into a simple and lightweight encoder-RNN-decoder-style network, UNISAL, and train it jointly with image and video saliency data. We evaluate our method on the video saliency datasets DHF1K, Hollywood-2 and UCF-Sports, and the image saliency datasets SALICON and MIT300. With one set of parameters, UNISAL achieves state-of-the-art performance on all video saliency datasets and is on par with the state-of-the-art for image saliency datasets, despite faster runtime and a 5 to 20-fold smaller model size compared to all competing deep methods. We provide retrospective analyses and ablation studies which confirm the importance of the domain shift modeling. The code is available at https://github.com/rdroste/unisal

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2003.05477")

Code

Syntology Ran 7 of 9 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 6 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran; community (archive-listed): 3 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

rdroste/unisal officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
lcc157/code mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 7 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
2ran · our draft was wrong
4ran
2unverified

Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

conv_1x1_bn rdroste/unisal/unisal/models/MobileNetV2.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a0131fb70c267a9e · report
conv_bn rdroste/unisal/unisal/models/MobileNetV2.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · e087cbfa1e53486d · report
get_kwargs_dict rdroste/unisal/unisal/utils.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 5b2e8323d628096d · report
get_kwargs_names rdroste/unisal/unisal/utils.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 2812f253b8a66480 · report
get_optimal_out_size rdroste/unisal/unisal/data.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · c101e7bffe5bcda9 · report
load_module rdroste/unisal/unisal/utils.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 11091601dda5e015 · report
normalize_map lcc157/code/unisal/salience_metrics.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 2859db1f0821894e · report
auc_judd lcc157/code/unisal/salience_metrics.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 386eb8dd9e132cce · report
auc_shuff_acl lcc157/code/unisal/salience_metrics.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · e64aa209f895e3d2 · report

Tasks

Domain AdaptationSaliency PredictionVideo Saliency Detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Video Saliency Detection MSU Video Saliency Prediction UNISAL (videos) AUC-J 0.858 #4 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Video Saliency Detection MSU Video Saliency Prediction UNISAL (videos) CC 0.707 #4 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Video Saliency Detection MSU Video Saliency Prediction UNISAL (videos) FPS 70.46 #4 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Video Saliency Detection MSU Video Saliency Prediction UNISAL (videos) KLDiv 0.536 #4 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Video Saliency Detection MSU Video Saliency Prediction UNISAL (videos) NSS 2.03 #4 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Video Saliency Detection MSU Video Saliency Prediction UNISAL (videos) SIM 0.609 #4 of 14 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

3D Convolution

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections