Papers › UNETR++: Delving into Efficient and Accurate 3D Medical Image Segmentation

UNETR++: Delving into Efficient and Accurate 3D Medical Image Segmentation

8 Dec 2022arXiv:2212.04497archive 2025-07-28

Abdelrahman Shaker, Muhammad Maaz, Hanoona Rasheed, Salman Khan, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Fahad Shahbaz Khan

Owing to the success of transformer models, recent works study their applicability in 3D medical segmentation tasks. Within the transformer models, the self-attention mechanism is one of the main building blocks that strives to capture long-range dependencies. However, the self-attention operation has quadratic complexity which proves to be a computational bottleneck, especially in volumetric medical imaging, where the inputs are 3D with numerous slices. In this paper, we propose a 3D medical image segmentation approach, named UNETR++, that offers both high-quality segmentation masks as well as efficiency in terms of parameters, compute cost, and inference speed. The core of our design is the introduction of a novel efficient paired attention (EPA) block that efficiently learns spatial and channel-wise discriminative features using a pair of inter-dependent branches based on spatial and channel attention. Our spatial attention formulation is efficient having linear complexity with respect to the input sequence length. To enable communication between spatial and channel-focused branches, we share the weights of query and key mapping functions that provide a complimentary benefit (paired attention), while also reducing the overall network parameters. Our extensive evaluations on five benchmarks, Synapse, BTCV, ACDC, BRaTs, and Decathlon-Lung, reveal the effectiveness of our contributions in terms of both efficiency and accuracy. On Synapse, our UNETR++ sets a new state-of-the-art with a Dice Score of 87.2%, while being significantly efficient with a reduction of over 71% in terms of both parameters and FLOPs, compared to the best method in the literature. Code: https://github.com/Amshaker/unetr_plus_plus.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2212.04497")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

amshaker/unetr_plus_plus officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
asif-hanif/vafa mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
2ran
5unverified

Licence: 1 of the 9 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from amshaker/unetr_plus_plus. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

jaccard amshaker/unetr_plus_plus/unetr_pp/evaluation/metrics.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 12b5ba241c136bb3 · report
precision amshaker/unetr_plus_plus/unetr_pp/evaluation/metrics.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 035dc40fdafe0275 · report
run_evaluation amshaker/unetr_plus_plus/unetr_pp/evaluation/evaluator.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · e7033836f7ce1958 · report
create_region_from_mask amshaker/unetr_plus_plus/unetr_pp/evaluation/region_based_evaluation.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 1df16eb62440aca6 · report
dice amshaker/unetr_plus_plus/unetr_pp/evaluation/metrics.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a85d8587c247d950 · report
dice amshaker/unetr_plus_plus/unetr_pp/inference_acdc.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · e65b0d891efe4fc8 · report
new_dice amshaker/unetr_plus_plus/unetr_pp/inference_tumor.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 2d2f06b87fe3610c · report
process_label amshaker/unetr_plus_plus/unetr_pp/inference_acdc.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · c11a7687e5a53d69 · report
check_input_folder_and_return_caseIDs identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong licence of this copy not recorded · 6789364bbb259134 · report

Tasks

Image SegmentationMedical Image SegmentationSegmentationSemantic Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections