Papers › Understanding the Intrinsic Robustness of Image Distributions using Conditional...

Understanding the Intrinsic Robustness of Image Distributions using Conditional Generative Models

1 Mar 2020arXiv:2003.00378archive 2025-07-28

Xiao Zhang, Jinghui Chen, Quanquan Gu, David Evans

Starting with Gilmer et al. (2018), several works have demonstrated the inevitability of adversarial examples based on different assumptions about the underlying input probability space. It remains unclear, however, whether these results apply to natural image distributions. In this work, we assume the underlying data distribution is captured by some conditional generative model, and prove intrinsic robustness bounds for a general class of classifiers, which solves an open problem in Fawzi et al. (2018). Building upon the state-of-the-art conditional generative models, we study the intrinsic robustness of two common image benchmarks under ℓ₂ perturbations, and show the existence of a large gap between the robustness limits implied by our theory and the adversarial robustness achieved by current state-of-the-art robust models. Code for all our experiments is available at https://github.com/xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2003.00378")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 9 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
8unverified

Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

squared_l2_norm xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob/train_classifier/adv_loss.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 724c88e3f81d2123 · report
check_args xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob/build_generator_mnist.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · b78ee352c8735875 · report
depth_to_space xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob/generative/src/util.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 5075d4eded93eec1 · report
madry_loss xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob/train_classifier/adv_loss.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · a6e5703583807cb4 · report
mnist_loader xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob/generative/acgan.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 45ee55b50948ee1c · report
normalize xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob/generative/src/util.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 1c11005825913bca · report
remove_spectral_norm xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob/generative/src/spectral_normalization.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 086ed50f42b2a3dd · report
spectral_norm xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob/generative/src/spectral_normalization.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 20fc434ea449700f · report
trades_loss xiaozhanguva/Intrinsic-Rob/train_classifier/adv_loss.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 92f367701add3745 · report

Tasks

Adversarial Robustness

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections