Papers › Understanding NFT Price Moves through Tweets Keywords Analysis
Understanding NFT Price Moves through Tweets Keywords Analysis
Junliang Luo, Yongzheng Jia, Xue Liu
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Non-Fungible Token (NFT) is evolving with the rise of the cryptocurrency market and the development of blockchain techniques, which leads to an emerging NFT market that has become prosperous rapidly then followed by a cooldown. Nevertheless, the overall rise procedure of the NFT market has not been well understood. To this end, we consider that social media communities evolving alongside the market growth, are worth exploring and reasoning about, as the mineable information might unveil the market behaviors. We explore the procedure from the perspective of NFT Twitter communities and its impact on the NFT price moves with two experiments. We perform a Granger causality test on the number of tweets and the NFT price time series and find that the number of tweets has a positive impact on (Granger-causes) the price or reversely for larger part of the 19 top authentic projects but seldom copycat projects. Besides, to investigate the price moves predictability, we experiment on predicting Markov normalized NFT price (representing the direction and magnitude of price moves) given tweets-extracted word features and interpret the feature importance to find insights. Our results show that social media words as the predictors result in all 19 top projects having a testing accuracy evidently above the baseline. Based on the feature importance analysis, we find that both general market-related words and NFT event-related words have a markedly positive contribution in predicting price moves. We summarize the characteristics including categorization and sentiment for the words with the top and least feature importance.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections