Papers › Understanding Interventional TreeSHAP : How and Why it Works

Understanding Interventional TreeSHAP : How and Why it Works

29 Sep 2022arXiv:2209.15123archive 2025-07-28

Gabriel Laberge, Yann Pequignot

Shapley values are ubiquitous in interpretable Machine Learning due to their strong theoretical background and efficient implementation in the SHAP library. Computing these values previously induced an exponential cost with respect to the number of input features of an opaque model. Now, with efficient implementations such as Interventional TreeSHAP, this exponential burden is alleviated assuming one is explaining ensembles of decision trees. Although Interventional TreeSHAP has risen in popularity, it still lacks a formal proof of how/why it works. We provide such proof with the aim of not only increasing the transparency of the algorithm but also to encourage further development of these ideas. Notably, our proof for Interventional TreeSHAP is easily adapted to Shapley-Taylor indices and one-hot-encoded features.

PaperPDFCode

Code

gablabc/understand_treeshap officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Interpretable Machine Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SHAP

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections