Papers › Understanding and improving transferability in machine-learned activation energy predictors
Understanding and improving transferability in machine-learned activation energy predictors
Joe Gilkes, Mark Storr, Reinhard J. Maurer, Scott Habershon
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The calculation of reactive properties is a challenging task in chemical reaction discovery. Machine learning (ML) methods play an important role in accelerating electronic structure predictions of activation energies and reaction enthalpies, and are a crucial ingredient to enable large-scale automated reaction network discovery with >10³ reactions. Unfortunately, the predictive accuracy of existing ML models does not yet reach the required accuracy across the space of possible chemical reactions to enable subsequent kinetic simulations that even qualitatively agree with experimental kinetics. Here, we comprehensively assess the underlying reasons for prediction failures within a selection of machine-learned models of reactivity. Models based on difference fingerprints between reactant and product structures lack transferability despite providing good in-distribution predictions. This results in a significant loss of information about the context and mechanism of chemical reactions. We propose a convolutional ML model that uses atom-centered quantum-chemical descriptors and approximate transition state information. Inclusion of the latter improves transferability for out-of-distribution benchmark reactions, making greater use of the limited chemical reaction space spanned by the training data. The model further delivers atom-level contributions to activation energies and reaction enthalpies that provide a useful interpretational tool for rationalizing reactivity.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections