Papers › Uncertainty-based quality assurance of carotid artery wall segmentation in black-blood MRI
Uncertainty-based quality assurance of carotid artery wall segmentation in black-blood MRI
Elina Thibeau-Sutre, Dieuwertje Alblas, Sophie Buurman, Christoph Brune, Jelmer M. Wolterink
The application of deep learning models to large-scale data sets requires means for automatic quality assurance. We have previously developed a fully automatic algorithm for carotid artery wall segmentation in black-blood MRI that we aim to apply to large-scale data sets. This method identifies nested artery walls in 3D patches centered on the carotid artery. In this study, we investigate to what extent the uncertainty in the model predictions for the contour location can serve as a surrogate for error detection and, consequently, automatic quality assurance. We express the quality of automatic segmentations using the Dice similarity coefficient. The uncertainty in the model's prediction is estimated using either Monte Carlo dropout or test-time data augmentation. We found that (1) including uncertainty measurements did not degrade the quality of the segmentations, (2) uncertainty metrics provide a good proxy of the quality of our contours if the center found during the first step is enclosed in the lumen of the carotid artery and (3) they could be used to detect low-quality segmentations at the participant level. This automatic quality assurance tool might enable the application of our model in large-scale data sets.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections