Papers › Uncertainty-Aware Hardware Trojan Detection Using Multimodal Deep Learning

Uncertainty-Aware Hardware Trojan Detection Using Multimodal Deep Learning

15 Jan 2024arXiv:2401.09479archive 2025-07-28

Rahul Vishwakarma, Amin Rezaei

The risk of hardware Trojans being inserted at various stages of chip production has increased in a zero-trust fabless era. To counter this, various machine learning solutions have been developed for the detection of hardware Trojans. While most of the focus has been on either a statistical or deep learning approach, the limited number of Trojan-infected benchmarks affects the detection accuracy and restricts the possibility of detecting zero-day Trojans. To close the gap, we first employ generative adversarial networks to amplify our data in two alternative representation modalities, a graph and a tabular, ensuring that the dataset is distributed in a representative manner. Further, we propose a multimodal deep learning approach to detect hardware Trojans and evaluate the results from both early fusion and late fusion strategies. We also estimate the uncertainty quantification metrics of each prediction for risk-aware decision-making. The outcomes not only confirms the efficacy of our proposed hardware Trojan detection method but also opens a new door for future studies employing multimodality and uncertainty quantification to address other hardware security challenges.

PaperPDFCode

Code

cars-lab-repo/noodle officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Decision MakingDeep LearningMultimodal Deep LearningUncertainty Quantification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Focus

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections