Papers › UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content
UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content
Zhengzhong Tu, Yilin Wang, Neil Birkbeck, Balu Adsumilli, Alan C. Bovik
Recent years have witnessed an explosion of user-generated content (UGC) videos shared and streamed over the Internet, thanks to the evolution of affordable and reliable consumer capture devices, and the tremendous popularity of social media platforms. Accordingly, there is a great need for accurate video quality assessment (VQA) models for UGC/consumer videos to monitor, control, and optimize this vast content. Blind quality prediction of in-the-wild videos is quite challenging, since the quality degradations of UGC content are unpredictable, complicated, and often commingled. Here we contribute to advancing the UGC-VQA problem by conducting a comprehensive evaluation of leading no-reference/blind VQA (BVQA) features and models on a fixed evaluation architecture, yielding new empirical insights on both subjective video quality studies and VQA model design. By employing a feature selection strategy on top of leading VQA model features, we are able to extract 60 of the 763 statistical features used by the leading models to create a new fusion-based BVQA model, which we dub the \textbf{VID}eo quality \textbf{EVAL}uator (VIDEVAL), that effectively balances the trade-off between VQA performance and efficiency. Our experimental results show that VIDEVAL achieves state-of-the-art performance at considerably lower computational cost than other leading models. Our study protocol also defines a reliable benchmark for the UGC-VQA problem, which we believe will facilitate further research on deep learning-based VQA modeling, as well as perceptually-optimized efficient UGC video processing, transcoding, and streaming. To promote reproducible research and public evaluation, an implementation of VIDEVAL has been made available online: \url{https://github.com/tu184044109/VIDEVAL_release}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video Quality Assessment | KoNViD-1k | VIDEVAL | PLCC | 0.7803 | #17 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Quality Assessment | LIVE-FB LSVQ | VIDEVAL | PLCC | 0.783 | #13 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Quality Assessment | LIVE-VQC | VIDEVAL | PLCC | 0.7514 | #18 of 20 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Quality Assessment | MSU NR VQA Database | VIDEVAL | KLCC | 0.5414 | #19 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Quality Assessment | MSU NR VQA Database | VIDEVAL | PLCC | 0.7717 | #19 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Quality Assessment | MSU NR VQA Database | VIDEVAL | SRCC | 0.7286 | #19 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Quality Assessment | MSU NR VQA Database | VIDEVAL | Type | NR | #19 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Quality Assessment | YouTube-UGC | VIDEVAL | PLCC | 0.7733 | #14 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections