Papers › Two-Phase Dynamic Analysis of Message-Passing Go Programs based on Vector Clocks

Two-Phase Dynamic Analysis of Message-Passing Go Programs based on Vector Clocks

10 Jul 2018arXiv:1807.03585links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Martin Sulzmann, Kai Stadtmueller

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Understanding the run-time behavior of concurrent programs is a challenging task. A popular approach is to establish a happens- before relation via vector clocks. Thus, we can identify bugs and per- formance bottlenecks, for example, by checking if two con icting events may happen concurrently. We employ a two-phase method to derive vector clock information for a wide range of concurrency features that includes all of the message-passing features in Go. The rst phase (instrumentation and tracing) yields a run-time trace that records all events related to message-passing concurrency that took place. The second phase (trace replay) is carried out o ine and replays the recorded traces to infer vector clock information. Trace replay operates on thread-local traces. Thus, we can observe behav- ior that might result from some alternative schedule. Our approach is not tied to any speci c language. We have built a prototype for the Go programming language and provide empirical evidence of the usefulness of our method.

PaperPDFCode

Code

KaiSta/gopherlyzer-GoScout officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections