Papers › Turning Dross Into Gold Loss: is BERT4Rec really better than SASRec?

Turning Dross Into Gold Loss: is BERT4Rec really better than SASRec?

14 Sep 2023arXiv:2309.07602archive 2025-07-28

Anton Klenitskiy, Alexey Vasilev

Recently sequential recommendations and next-item prediction task has become increasingly popular in the field of recommender systems. Currently, two state-of-the-art baselines are Transformer-based models SASRec and BERT4Rec. Over the past few years, there have been quite a few publications comparing these two algorithms and proposing new state-of-the-art models. In most of the publications, BERT4Rec achieves better performance than SASRec. But BERT4Rec uses cross-entropy over softmax for all items, while SASRec uses negative sampling and calculates binary cross-entropy loss for one positive and one negative item. In our work, we show that if both models are trained with the same loss, which is used by BERT4Rec, then SASRec will significantly outperform BERT4Rec both in terms of quality and training speed. In addition, we show that SASRec could be effectively trained with negative sampling and still outperform BERT4Rec, but the number of negative examples should be much larger than one.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2309.07602")

Code

Syntology Ran 5 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 6 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

antklen/sasrec-bert4rec-recsys23 officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

5ran
1unverified

Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from antklen/sasrec-bert4rec-recsys23. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

add_time_idx antklen/sasrec-bert4rec-recsys23/src/preprocess.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 467b851e63127006 · report
compute_sampled_metrics antklen/sasrec-bert4rec-recsys23/src/metrics.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 09f52363a52754fb · report
filter_items antklen/sasrec-bert4rec-recsys23/src/preprocess.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 6ffa95356061fcd2 · report
filter_users antklen/sasrec-bert4rec-recsys23/src/preprocess.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · d9dbb26131fc67ce · report
preds2recs antklen/sasrec-bert4rec-recsys23/src/postprocess.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 14e5b7bc08bf8ed1 · report
extract_validation_history antklen/sasrec-bert4rec-recsys23/src/utils.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · f3a4bdf8809934fe · report

Tasks

Recommendation Systems

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Softmax

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections