Papers › Trust your source: quantifying source condition elements for variational regularisation methods

Trust your source: quantifying source condition elements for variational regularisation methods

1 Mar 2023arXiv:2303.00696links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Martin Benning, Tatiana A. Bubba, Luca Ratti, Danilo Riccio

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Source conditions are a key tool in regularisation theory that are needed to derive error estimates and convergence rates for ill-posed inverse problems. In this paper, we provide a recipe to practically compute source condition elements as the solution of convex minimisation problems that can be solved with first-order algorithms. We demonstrate the validity of our approach by testing it on two inverse problem case studies in machine learning and image processing: sparse coefficient estimation of a polynomial via LASSO regression and recovering an image from a subset of the coefficients of its discrete Fourier transform. We further demonstrate that the proposed approach can easily be modified to solve the machine learning task of identifying the optimal sampling pattern in the Fourier domain for a given image and variational regularisation method, which has applications in the context of sparsity promoting reconstruction from magnetic resonance imaging data.

PaperPDFCode

Code

reacho/source-condition officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections