Papers › Treating Detector Systematics via a Likelihood Free Inference Method
Treating Detector Systematics via a Likelihood Free Inference Method
Leander Fischer, Richard Naab, Alexandra Trettin
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Estimating the impact of systematic uncertainties in particle physics experiments is challenging, especially since the detector response is unknown analytically in most situations and needs to be estimated through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Typically, detector property varia-tions are parameterized in ways that implicitly assume a specific physics model, which can introduce biases on quantities measured by an analysis. In this paper, we present a method to recover a model-independent, event-wise estimation of the detector response variation by applying a likelihood-free inference method to a set of MC simulations representing discrete detector realizations. The method provides a re-weighting scheme for every event, which can be used to apply the effects of detector property variations fully decoupled from the assumed physics model. Using a toy MC example inspired by fixed-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments, we demonstrate the performance of our method. We show that it fully decouples the modeling of the detector response from the physics parameters to be measured in a MC forward-folding analysis.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections