Papers › Translation-Invariant Quantum Algorithms for Ordered Search are Optimal

Translation-Invariant Quantum Algorithms for Ordered Search are Optimal

27 Mar 2025arXiv:2503.21090links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Joseph Carolan, Andrew M. Childs, Matt Kovacs-Deak, Luke Schaeffer

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Ordered search is the task of finding an item in an ordered list using comparison queries. The best exact classical algorithm for this fundamental problem uses ⌈log₂n⌉ queries for a list of length n. Quantum computers can achieve a constant-factor speedup, but the best possible coefficient of log₂n for exact quantum algorithms is only known to lie between (ln2)/π≈0.221 and 4/log₂605 ≈0.433. We consider a special class of translation-invariant algorithms with no workspace, introduced by Farhi, Goldstone, Gutmann, and Sipser, that has been used to find the best known upper bounds. First, we show that any bounded-error, k-query quantum algorithm for ordered search can be implemented by a k-query algorithm in this special class. Second, we use linear programming to show that the best exact $5$-query quantum algorithm can search a list of length $7265$, giving an ordered search algorithm that asymptotically uses 5 log₇₂₆₅n ≈0.390 log₂n quantum queries.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections