Papers › Transductive Information Maximization For Few-Shot Learning

Transductive Information Maximization For Few-Shot Learning

25 Aug 2020arXiv:2008.11297archive 2025-07-28

Malik Boudiaf, Ziko Imtiaz Masud, Jérôme Rony, José Dolz, Pablo Piantanida, Ismail Ben Ayed

We introduce Transductive Infomation Maximization (TIM) for few-shot learning. Our method maximizes the mutual information between the query features and their label predictions for a given few-shot task, in conjunction with a supervision loss based on the support set. Furthermore, we propose a new alternating-direction solver for our mutual-information loss, which substantially speeds up transductive-inference convergence over gradient-based optimization, while yielding similar accuracy. TIM inference is modular: it can be used on top of any base-training feature extractor. Following standard transductive few-shot settings, our comprehensive experiments demonstrate that TIM outperforms state-of-the-art methods significantly across various datasets and networks, while used on top of a fixed feature extractor trained with simple cross-entropy on the base classes, without resorting to complex meta-learning schemes. It consistently brings between 2% and 5% improvement in accuracy over the best performing method, not only on all the well-established few-shot benchmarks but also on more challenging scenarios,with domain shifts and larger numbers of classes.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2008.11297")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 10 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 6 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 7 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran; community (archive-listed): 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

mboudiaf/TIM officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
2ran
6unverified

Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_one_hot mboudiaf/TIM/src/utils.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · a03c85ae21c3b667 · report
conv_block mboudiaf/TIM/src/models/Conv4.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 02652b1ac1a54dda · report
get_features mboudiaf/TIM/src/utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 12cbd4d101797d30 · report
get_logs_path mboudiaf/TIM/src/utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · e232226ad7c9556f · report
get_metric mboudiaf/TIM/src/models/ProtoNet.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 235da783eeb0573f · report
with_augment mboudiaf/TIM/src/datasets/transform.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 97533e04cdf4da7e · report
without_augment mboudiaf/TIM/src/datasets/transform.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · e1f7a44f9ac823d7 · report
FewShotClassifier sicara/easy-few-shot-learning/easyfsl/methods/tim.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 637e871cf76bfc10 · report
TIM sicara/easy-few-shot-learning/easyfsl/methods/tim.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · c46ba9a1cacbe109 · report
compute_prototypes sicara/easy-few-shot-learning/easyfsl/methods/tim.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 31e41d7e676cb492 · report

Tasks

Few-Shot Image ClassificationFew-Shot LearningMeta-Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Few-Shot Image Classification CUB 200 5-way 1-shot TIM-GD Accuracy 82.2% #17 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification CUB 200 5-way 5-shot TIM-GD Accuracy 90.8 #19 of 32 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-ImageNet to CUB - 5 shot learning TIM-GD Accuracy 71 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 10-way (1-shot) TIM-GD Accuracy 56.1 #3 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 10-way (5-shot) TIM-GD Accuracy 72.8 #3 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 20-way (1-shot) TIM-GD Accuracy 39.3 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 20-way (5-shot) TIM-GD Accuracy 59.5 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 5-way (1-shot) TIM-GD Accuracy 77.80 #18 of 105 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Tiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot) TIM-GD Accuracy 82.1 #9 of 49 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Tiered ImageNet 5-way (5-shot) TIM-GD Accuracy 89.8 #8 of 51 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Learning Mini-ImageNet - 5-Shot Learning TIM-GD Accuracy 87.4% #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections