Papers › Trajectory Clustering Performance Evaluation: If we know the answer, it's not clustering
Trajectory Clustering Performance Evaluation: If we know the answer, it's not clustering
Mohsen Rezaie, Nicolas Saunier
Advancements in Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS) have made huge amounts of traffic data available through automatic data collection. A big part of this data is stored as trajectories of moving vehicles and road users. Automatic analysis of this data with minimal human supervision would both lower the costs and eliminate subjectivity of the analysis. Trajectory clustering is an unsupervised task. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive comparison of similarity measures, clustering algorithms and evaluation measures using trajectory data from seven intersections. We also propose a method to automatically generate trajectory reference clusters based on their origin and destination points to be used for label-based evaluation measures. Therefore, the entire procedure remains unsupervised both in clustering and evaluation levels. Finally, we use a combination of evaluation measures to find the top performing similarity measures and clustering algorithms for each intersection. The results show that there is no single combination of distance and clustering algorithm that is always among the top ten clustering setups.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections