Papers › Training biases in machine learning for the analytic continuation of quantum many-body...
Training biases in machine learning for the analytic continuation of quantum many-body Green's functions
Rong Zhang, Maximilian E. Merkel, Sophie Beck, Claude Ederer
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We address the problem of analytic continuation of imaginary-frequency Green's functions, which is crucial in many-body physics, using machine learning based on a multi-level residual neural network. We specifically address potential biases that can be introduced due to the use of artificially created spectral functions that are employed to train the neural network. We also implement an uncertainty estimation of the predicted spectral function, based on Monte Carlo dropout, which allows to identify frequency regions where the prediction might not be accurate, and we study the effect of noise, in particular also for situations where the noise level during training is different from that in the actual data. Our analysis demonstrates that this method can indeed achieve a high quality of prediction, comparable or better than the widely used maximum entropy method, but that further improvement is currently limited by the lack of true data that can be used for training. We also benchmark our approach by applying it to the case of SrVO₃, where an accurate spectral function has been obtained from dynamical mean-field theory using a solver that works directly on the real frequency axis.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections