Papers › Towards Top-Down Just Noticeable Difference Estimation of Natural Images
Towards Top-Down Just Noticeable Difference Estimation of Natural Images
Qiuping Jiang, Zhentao Liu, Shiqi Wang, Feng Shao, Weisi Lin
Just noticeable difference (JND) of natural images refers to the maximum pixel intensity change magnitude that typical human visual system (HVS) cannot perceive. Existing efforts on JND estimation mainly dedicate to modeling the diverse masking effects in either/both spatial or/and frequency domains, and then fusing them into an overall JND estimate. In this work, we turn to a dramatically different way to address this problem with a top-down design philosophy. Instead of explicitly formulating and fusing different masking effects in a bottom-up way, the proposed JND estimation model dedicates to first predicting a critical perceptual lossless (CPL) counterpart of the original image and then calculating the difference map between the original image and the predicted CPL image as the JND map. We conduct subjective experiments to determine the critical points of 500 images and find that the distribution of cumulative normalized KLT coefficient energy values over all 500 images at these critical points can be well characterized by a Weibull distribution. Given a testing image, its corresponding critical point is determined by a simple weighted average scheme where the weights are determined by a fitted Weibull distribution function. The performance of the proposed JND model is evaluated explicitly with direct JND prediction and implicitly with two applications including JND-guided noise injection and JND-guided image compression. Experimental results have demonstrated that our proposed JND model can achieve better performance than several latest JND models. In addition, we also compare the proposed JND model with existing visual difference predicator (VDP) metrics in terms of the capability in distortion detection and discrimination. The results indicate that our JND model also has a good performance in this task.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2108.05058")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from zhentao-liu/klt-jnd. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
6da4e3d0be77b7c1 · report
e5469cbe6b466c48 · report
0f52022980fd0649 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections