Papers › Towards quantitative precision for ECG analysis: Leveraging state space models,...

Towards quantitative precision for ECG analysis: Leveraging state space models, self-supervision and patient metadata

29 Aug 2023arXiv:2308.15291archive 2025-07-28

Temesgen Mehari, Nils Strodthoff

Deep learning has emerged as the preferred modeling approach for automatic ECG analysis. In this study, we investigate three elements aimed at improving the quantitative accuracy of such systems. These components consistently enhance performance beyond the existing state-of-the-art, which is predominantly based on convolutional models. Firstly, we explore more expressive architectures by exploiting structured state space models (SSMs). These models have shown promise in capturing long-term dependencies in time series data. By incorporating SSMs into our approach, we not only achieve better performance, but also gain insights into long-standing questions in the field. Specifically, for standard diagnostic tasks, we find no advantage in using higher sampling rates such as 500Hz compared to 100Hz. Similarly, extending the input size of the model beyond 3 seconds does not lead to significant improvements. Secondly, we demonstrate that self-supervised learning using contrastive predictive coding can further improve the performance of SSMs. By leveraging self-supervision, we enable the model to learn more robust and representative features, leading to improved analysis accuracy. Lastly, we depart from synthetic benchmarking scenarios and incorporate basic demographic metadata alongside the ECG signal as input. This inclusion of patient metadata departs from the conventional practice of relying solely on the signal itself. Remarkably, this addition consistently yields positive effects on predictive performance. We firmly believe that all three components should be considered when developing next-generation ECG analysis algorithms.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 5 ran; 3 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from tmehari/ssm_ecg. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections