Papers › Towards Principled, Practical Policy Gradient for Bandits and Tabular MDPs

Towards Principled, Practical Policy Gradient for Bandits and Tabular MDPs

21 May 2024arXiv:2405.13136archive 2025-07-28

Michael Lu, Matin Aghaei, Anant Raj, Sharan Vaswani

We consider (stochastic) softmax policy gradient (PG) methods for bandits and tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs). While the PG objective is non-concave, recent research has used the objective's smoothness and gradient domination properties to achieve convergence to an optimal policy. However, these theoretical results require setting the algorithm parameters according to unknown problem-dependent quantities (e.g. the optimal action or the true reward vector in a bandit problem). To address this issue, we borrow ideas from the optimization literature to design practical, principled PG methods in both the exact and stochastic settings. In the exact setting, we employ an Armijo line-search to set the step-size for softmax PG and demonstrate a linear convergence rate. In the stochastic setting, we utilize exponentially decreasing step-sizes, and characterize the convergence rate of the resulting algorithm. We show that the proposed algorithm offers similar theoretical guarantees as the state-of-the art results, but does not require the knowledge of oracle-like quantities. For the multi-armed bandit setting, our techniques result in a theoretically-principled PG algorithm that does not require explicit exploration, the knowledge of the reward gap, the reward distributions, or the noise. Finally, we empirically compare the proposed methods to PG approaches that require oracle knowledge, and demonstrate competitive performance.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 11 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from sudo-michael/practical-pg. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections