Papers › Towards Interpreting Language Models: A Case Study in Multi-Hop Reasoning

Towards Interpreting Language Models: A Case Study in Multi-Hop Reasoning

6 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.05037archive 2025-07-28

Mansi Sakarvadia

Answering multi-hop reasoning questions requires retrieving and synthesizing information from diverse sources. Language models (LMs) struggle to perform such reasoning consistently. We propose an approach to pinpoint and rectify multi-hop reasoning failures through targeted memory injections on LM attention heads. First, we analyze the per-layer activations of GPT-2 models in response to single- and multi-hop prompts. We then propose a mechanism that allows users to inject relevant prompt-specific information, which we refer to as "memories," at critical LM locations during inference. By thus enabling the LM to incorporate additional relevant information during inference, we enhance the quality of multi-hop prompt completions. We empirically show that a simple, efficient, and targeted memory injection into a key attention layer often increases the probability of the desired next token in multi-hop tasks, by up to 424%. We observe that small subsets of attention heads can significantly impact the model prediction during multi-hop reasoning. To more faithfully interpret these heads, we develop Attention Lens: an open source tool that translates the outputs of attention heads into vocabulary tokens via learned transformations called lenses. We demonstrate the use of lenses to reveal how a model arrives at its answer and use them to localize sources of model failures such as in the case of biased and malicious language generation.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from msakarvadia/attentionlens. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections