Papers › Towards Human Understanding of Paraphrase Types in ChatGPT

Towards Human Understanding of Paraphrase Types in ChatGPT

2 Jul 2024arXiv:2407.02302archive 2025-07-28

Dominik Meier, Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas, Bela Gipp

Paraphrases represent a human's intuitive ability to understand expressions presented in various different ways. Current paraphrase evaluations of language models primarily use binary approaches, offering limited interpretability of specific text changes. Atomic paraphrase types (APT) decompose paraphrases into different linguistic changes and offer a granular view of the flexibility in linguistic expression (e.g., a shift in syntax or vocabulary used). In this study, we assess the human preferences towards ChatGPT in generating English paraphrases with ten APTs and five prompting techniques. We introduce APTY (Atomic Paraphrase TYpes), a dataset of 500 sentence-level and word-level annotations by 15 annotators. The dataset also provides a human preference ranking of paraphrases with different types that can be used to fine-tune models with RLHF and DPO methods. Our results reveal that ChatGPT can generate simple APTs, such as additions and deletions, but struggle with complex structures (e.g., subordination changes). This study contributes to understanding which aspects of paraphrasing language models have already succeeded at understanding and what remains elusive. In addition, our curated datasets can be used to develop language models with specific linguistic capabilities.

PaperPDFCode

Code

worta/apty officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
cluebbers/dpo-rlhf-paraphrase-types mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Sentence

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

DPO

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections