Papers › Towards Efficient Pixel Labeling for Industrial Anomaly Detection and Localization

Towards Efficient Pixel Labeling for Industrial Anomaly Detection and Localization

3 Jul 2024arXiv:2407.03130archive 2025-07-28

Hanxi Li, Jingqi Wu, Lin Yuanbo Wu, Hao Chen, Deyin Liu, Chunhua Shen

In the realm of practical Anomaly Detection (AD) tasks, manual labeling of anomalous pixels proves to be a costly endeavor. Consequently, many AD methods are crafted as one-class classifiers, tailored for training sets completely devoid of anomalies, ensuring a more cost-effective approach. While some pioneering work has demonstrated heightened AD accuracy by incorporating real anomaly samples in training, this enhancement comes at the price of labor-intensive labeling processes. This paper strikes the balance between AD accuracy and labeling expenses by introducing ADClick, a novel Interactive Image Segmentation (IIS) algorithm. ADClick efficiently generates "ground-truth" anomaly masks for real defective images, leveraging innovative residual features and meticulously crafted language prompts. Notably, ADClick showcases a significantly elevated generalization capacity compared to existing state-of-the-art IIS approaches. Functioning as an anomaly labeling tool, ADClick generates high-quality anomaly labels (AP = 94.1% on MVTec AD) based on only $3$ to $5$ manual click annotations per training image. Furthermore, we extend the capabilities of ADClick into ADClick-Seg, an enhanced model designed for anomaly detection and localization. By fine-tuning the ADClick-Seg model using the weak labels inferred by ADClick, we establish the state-of-the-art performances in supervised AD tasks (AP = 86.4% on MVTec AD and AP = 78.4%, PRO = 98.6% on KSDD2).

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Anomaly DetectionImage SegmentationSemantic SegmentationSupervised Anomaly Detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Anomaly Detection MVTec AD ADClick Detection AUROC 99.7 #11 of 148 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MVTec AD ADClick Segmentation AP 82.9 #11 of 148 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MVTec AD ADClick Segmentation AUPRO 97.8 #11 of 148 Archive leaderboard report
Anomaly Detection MVTec AD ADClick Segmentation AUROC 99.2 #11 of 148 Archive leaderboard report
Supervised Anomaly Detection MVTec AD ADClick Detection AUROC 99.6 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Supervised Anomaly Detection MVTec AD ADClick Segmentation AP 86.4 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Supervised Anomaly Detection MVTec AD ADClick Segmentation AUPRO 98.2 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Supervised Anomaly Detection MVTec AD ADClick Segmentation AUROC 99.6 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections