Papers › Towards Efficient Pixel Labeling for Industrial Anomaly Detection and Localization
Towards Efficient Pixel Labeling for Industrial Anomaly Detection and Localization
Hanxi Li, Jingqi Wu, Lin Yuanbo Wu, Hao Chen, Deyin Liu, Chunhua Shen
In the realm of practical Anomaly Detection (AD) tasks, manual labeling of anomalous pixels proves to be a costly endeavor. Consequently, many AD methods are crafted as one-class classifiers, tailored for training sets completely devoid of anomalies, ensuring a more cost-effective approach. While some pioneering work has demonstrated heightened AD accuracy by incorporating real anomaly samples in training, this enhancement comes at the price of labor-intensive labeling processes. This paper strikes the balance between AD accuracy and labeling expenses by introducing ADClick, a novel Interactive Image Segmentation (IIS) algorithm. ADClick efficiently generates "ground-truth" anomaly masks for real defective images, leveraging innovative residual features and meticulously crafted language prompts. Notably, ADClick showcases a significantly elevated generalization capacity compared to existing state-of-the-art IIS approaches. Functioning as an anomaly labeling tool, ADClick generates high-quality anomaly labels (AP = 94.1% on MVTec AD) based on only $3$ to $5$ manual click annotations per training image. Furthermore, we extend the capabilities of ADClick into ADClick-Seg, an enhanced model designed for anomaly detection and localization. By fine-tuning the ADClick-Seg model using the weak labels inferred by ADClick, we establish the state-of-the-art performances in supervised AD tasks (AP = 86.4% on MVTec AD and AP = 78.4%, PRO = 98.6% on KSDD2).
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | ADClick | Detection AUROC | 99.7 | #11 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | ADClick | Segmentation AP | 82.9 | #11 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | ADClick | Segmentation AUPRO | 97.8 | #11 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | ADClick | Segmentation AUROC | 99.2 | #11 of 148 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Supervised Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | ADClick | Detection AUROC | 99.6 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Supervised Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | ADClick | Segmentation AP | 86.4 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Supervised Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | ADClick | Segmentation AUPRO | 98.2 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Supervised Anomaly Detection | MVTec AD | ADClick | Segmentation AUROC | 99.6 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections