Papers › Towards Bridging the Cross-modal Semantic Gap for Multi-modal Recommendation
Towards Bridging the Cross-modal Semantic Gap for Multi-modal Recommendation
Xinglong Wu, Anfeng Huang, HongWei Yang, Hui He, Yu Tai, Weizhe Zhang
Multi-modal recommendation greatly enhances the performance of recommender systems by modeling the auxiliary information from multi-modality contents. Most existing multi-modal recommendation models primarily exploit multimedia information propagation processes to enrich item representations and directly utilize modal-specific embedding vectors independently obtained from upstream pre-trained models. However, this might be inappropriate since the abundant task-specific semantics remain unexplored, and the cross-modality semantic gap hinders the recommendation performance. Inspired by the recent progress of the cross-modal alignment model CLIP, in this paper, we propose a novel \textbf{CLIP} \textbf{E}nhanced \textbf{R}ecommender (\textbf{CLIPER}) framework to bridge the semantic gap between modalities and extract fine-grained multi-view semantic information. Specifically, we introduce a multi-view modality-alignment approach for representation extraction and measure the semantic similarity between modalities. Furthermore, we integrate the multi-view multimedia representations into downstream recommendation models. Extensive experiments conducted on three public datasets demonstrate the consistent superiority of our model over state-of-the-art multi-modal recommendation models.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections