Papers › Toward Efficient and Robust Multiple Camera Visual-inertial Odometry

Toward Efficient and Robust Multiple Camera Visual-inertial Odometry

24 Sep 2021arXiv:2109.12030links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Yao He, Huai Yu, Wen Yang, Sebastian Scherer

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Efficiency and robustness are the essential criteria for the visual-inertial odometry (VIO) system. To process massive visual data, the high cost on CPU resources and computation latency limits VIO's possibility in integration with other applications. Recently, the powerful embedded GPUs have great potentials to improve the front-end image processing capability. Meanwhile, multi-camera systems can increase the visual constraints for back-end optimization. Inspired by these insights, we incorporate the GPU-enhanced algorithms in the field of VIO and thus propose a new front-end with NVIDIA Vision Programming Interface (VPI). This new front-end then enables multi-camera VIO feature association and provides more stable back-end pose optimization. Experiments with our new front-end on monocular datasets show the CPU resource occupation rate and computational latency are reduced by 40.4% and 50.6% without losing accuracy compared with the original VIO. The multi-camera system shows a higher VIO initialization success rate and better robustness overall state estimation.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections