Papers › TORQUE: A Reading Comprehension Dataset of Temporal Ordering Questions

TORQUE: A Reading Comprehension Dataset of Temporal Ordering Questions

1 May 2020EMNLP 2020 11arXiv:2005.00242archive 2025-07-28

Qiang Ning, Hao Wu, Rujun Han, Nanyun Peng, Matt Gardner, Dan Roth

A critical part of reading is being able to understand the temporal relationships between events described in a passage of text, even when those relationships are not explicitly stated. However, current machine reading comprehension benchmarks have practically no questions that test temporal phenomena, so systems trained on these benchmarks have no capacity to answer questions such as "what happened before/after [some event]?" We introduce TORQUE, a new English reading comprehension benchmark built on 3.2k news snippets with 21k human-generated questions querying temporal relationships. Results show that RoBERTa-large achieves an exact-match score of 51% on the test set of TORQUE, about 30% behind human performance.

PaperPDFConference PDF

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Machine Reading ComprehensionQuestion AnsweringReading Comprehension

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

Torque

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Question Answering Torque RoBERTa-large C 34.5 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Question Answering Torque RoBERTa-large EM 51.1 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Question Answering Torque RoBERTa-large F1 75.2 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections