Papers › Topic Modelling Brazilian Supreme Court Lawsuits

Topic Modelling Brazilian Supreme Court Lawsuits

1 Dec 2020archive 2025-07-28

Pedro Henrique Luz de Araujo, Teófilo Emidio de Campos

The present work proposes the use of Latent Dirichlet Allocation to model Extraordinary Appeals received by Brazil’s Supreme Court. The data consist of a corpus of 45,532 lawsuits manually annotated by the Court’s experts with theme labels, a multi-class and multi-label classification task. We initially train models with 10 and 30 topics and analyze their semantics by examining each topic’s most relevant words and their most representative texts, aiming to evaluate model interpretability and quality. We also train models with 30, 100, 300 and 1,000 topics, and quantitatively evaluate their potential using the topics to generate feature vectors for each appeal. These vectors are then used to train a lawsuit theme classifier. We compare traditional bag-of-words approaches (word counts and tf-idf values) with the topic-based text representation to assess topic relevancy. Our topics semantic analysis demonstrate that our models with 10 and 30 topics were capable of capturing some of the legal matters discussed by the Court. In addition, our experiments show that the model with 300 topics was the best text vectoriser and that the interpretable, low dimensional representations it generates achieve good classification results.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

MUlTI-LABEL-ClASSIFICATIONMulti-Label Classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Interpretability

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections