Papers › Timing irregularities and glitches from the pulsar monitoring campaign at IAR

Timing irregularities and glitches from the pulsar monitoring campaign at IAR

24 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.17099links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

E. Zubieta, F. Garcia, S. del Palacio, S. B. Araujo Furlan, G. Gancio, C. O. Lousto, J. A. Combi, C. M. Espinoza

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Context. Pulsars have a very stable rotation. However, sudden increases in their rotation frequency known as glitches, perturb their evolution. While large glitches are commonly detected, small glitches are harder to detect because of the lack of daily-cadence observations over long periods of time. Aims. We aim to explore the timing behaviour of young pulsars at daily timescales looking for small glitches and other irregularities. This will further our comprehension of the distribution of glitch sizes, which has also consequences for the theoretical modeling of the glitch mechanism. Methods. We observed six pulsars with up to daily cadence during 5 years with the antennas of the Argentine Institute of Radio Astronomy (IAR). We used standard pulsar timing tools to characterise the rotation of pulsars and developed an algorithm to look for small timing events in the data and calculate the changes in ν and ν̇ at those epochs. Results. We found that the rotation of pulsars in this dataset is affected by small step changes in ν and ν̇. We found three glitches that had not been reported before: two in PSR J1048-5832 with relative sizes Δν/ ν= 9.1(4) ×10⁻¹⁰ and Δν/ ν= 4.5(1) ×10⁻¹⁰, and one in the Vela pulsar with a size Δν/ ν= 2.0(2) ×10⁻¹⁰. We also report new decay terms on the 2021 Vela giant glitch, and on the 2022 giant glitches in PSR J0742-2822 and PSR J1740-3015 respectively. Besides, we found that the red noise contribution significantly diminished in PSR J0742-2822 after its giant glitch in 2022. Conclusions. Our results highlight the importance of high-cadence monitoring with an exhaustive analysis of the residuals to better characterize the distribution of glitch sizes and to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms behind glitches, red noise and timing irregularities.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections