Papers › TimeSuite: Improving MLLMs for Long Video Understanding via Grounded Tuning

TimeSuite: Improving MLLMs for Long Video Understanding via Grounded Tuning

25 Oct 2024arXiv:2410.19702archive 2025-07-28

Xiangyu Zeng, Kunchang Li, Chenting Wang, Xinhao Li, Tianxiang Jiang, Ziang Yan, Songze Li, Yansong Shi, Zhengrong Yue, Yi Wang, Yali Wang, Yu Qiao, LiMin Wang

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in short video understanding. However, understanding long-form videos still remains challenging for MLLMs. This paper proposes TimeSuite, a collection of new designs to adapt the existing short-form video MLLMs for long video understanding, including a simple yet efficient framework to process long video sequence, a high-quality video dataset for grounded tuning of MLLMs, and a carefully-designed instruction tuning task to explicitly incorporate the grounding supervision in the traditional QA format. Specifically, based on VideoChat, we propose our long-video MLLM, coined as VideoChat-T, by implementing a token shuffling to compress long video tokens and introducing Temporal Adaptive Position Encoding (TAPE) to enhance the temporal awareness of visual representation. Meanwhile, we introduce the TimePro, a comprehensive grounding-centric instruction tuning dataset composed of 9 tasks and 349k high-quality grounded annotations. Notably, we design a new instruction tuning task type, called Temporal Grounded Caption, to peform detailed video descriptions with the corresponding time stamps prediction. This explicit temporal location prediction will guide MLLM to correctly attend on the visual content when generating description, and thus reduce the hallucination risk caused by the LLMs. Experimental results demonstrate that our TimeSuite provides a successful solution to enhance the long video understanding capability of short-form MLLM, achieving improvement of 5.6% and 6.8% on the benchmarks of Egoschema and VideoMME, respectively. In addition, VideoChat-T exhibits robust zero-shot temporal grounding capabilities, significantly outperforming the existing state-of-the-art MLLMs. After fine-tuning, it performs on par with the traditional supervised expert models.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2410.19702")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 6 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

OpenGVLab/TimeSuite mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · fixture could not drive it
2ran
3unverified

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from OpenGVLab/TimeSuite. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_sim OpenGVLab/TimeSuite/models/criterions.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · a475c4129bb51880 · report
interpolate_temporal_pos_embed OpenGVLab/TimeSuite/models/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it MIT (permissive) · f64c56c357505158 · report
load_temp_embed_with_mismatch OpenGVLab/TimeSuite/models/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 5349fd1148712a53 · report
load_image_from_path OpenGVLab/TimeSuite/dataset/utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 1ffcca73cb98381a · report
pre_text OpenGVLab/TimeSuite/dataset/utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · b4d051f7063e9a7b · report
preprocess_para_retrieval_data OpenGVLab/TimeSuite/dataset/pt_dataset.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 54d3e29e64d0e87c · report

Tasks

HallucinationHighlight DetectionMoment RetrievalVideo Question AnsweringVideo UnderstandingZero-Shot Video Question Answer

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Highlight Detection QVHighlights VideoChat-T (FT) Hit@1 55.3 #19 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Highlight Detection QVHighlights VideoChat-T (FT) mAP 27.0 #19 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Moment Retrieval Charades-STA VideoChat-T (FT) R@1 IoU=0.5 67.1 #7 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Moment Retrieval Charades-STA VideoChat-T (FT) R@1 IoU=0.7 43.0 #7 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Moment Retrieval Charades-STA VideoChat-T (ZS) R@1 IoU=0.5 48.7 #23 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Moment Retrieval Charades-STA VideoChat-T (ZS) R@1 IoU=0.7 24.0 #23 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Moment Retrieval Charades-STA VideoChat-T (ZS) mIoU 45.43 #23 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Video Question Answering MVBench VideoChat-T (7B) Avg. 59.9 #7 of 22 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer EgoSchema (fullset) VideoChat-T (7B) Accuracy 60.0 #11 of 29 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer EgoSchema (subset) VideoChat-T (7B) Accuracy 68.4 #2 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer Video-MME VideoChat-T (7B) Accuracy (%) 55.8 #11 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer Video-MME (w/o subs) VideoChat-T (7B) Accuracy (%) 46.3 #9 of 9 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections