Papers › Three dimensions, two microscopes, one code: automatic differentiation for x-ray...
Three dimensions, two microscopes, one code: automatic differentiation for x-ray nanotomography beyond the depth of focus limit
Ming Du, Youssef S. G. Nashed, Saugat Kandel, Doga Gursoy, Chris Jacobsen
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Conventional tomographic reconstruction algorithms assume that one has obtained pure projection images, involving no within-specimen diffraction effects nor multiple scattering. Advances in x-ray nanotomography are leading towards the violation of these assumptions, by combining the high penetration power of x-rays which enables thick specimens to be imaged, with improved spatial resolution which decreases the depth of focus of the imaging system. We describe a reconstruction method where multiple scattering and diffraction effects in thick samples are modeled by multislice propagation, and the 3D object function is retrieved through iterative optimization. We show that the same proposed method works for both full-field microscopy, and for coherent scanning techniques like ptychography. Our implementation utilizes the optimization toolbox and the automatic differentiation capability of the open-source deep learning package TensorFlow, which demonstrates a much straightforward way to solve optimization problems in computational imaging, and endows our program great flexibility and portability.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections