Papers › Thinking Through and Writing About Research Ethics Beyond "Broader Impact"
Thinking Through and Writing About Research Ethics Beyond "Broader Impact"
Kate Sim, Andrew Brown, Amelia Hassoun
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In March 2021, we held the first instalment of the tutorial on thinking through and writing about research ethics beyond 'Broader Impact' in conjunction with the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '21). The goal of this tutorial was to offer a conceptual and practical starting point for engineers and social scientists interested in thinking more expansively, holistically, and critically about research ethics. This report provides an outline of the tutorial, and contains our 'lifecourse checklist'. This was presented as part of the tutorial, and provides a practical starting point for researchers when thinking about research ethics before a project's start. We provide this to the research community, with the hope that researchers use it when considering the ethics of their research.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections