Papers › ThingTalk: An Extensible, Executable Representation Language for Task-Oriented Dialogues

ThingTalk: An Extensible, Executable Representation Language for Task-Oriented Dialogues

23 Mar 2022arXiv:2203.12751archive 2025-07-28

Monica S. Lam, Giovanni Campagna, Mehrad Moradshahi, Sina J. Semnani, Silei Xu

Task-oriented conversational agents rely on semantic parsers to translate natural language to formal representations. In this paper, we propose the design and rationale of the ThingTalk formal representation, and how the design improves the development of transactional task-oriented agents. ThingTalk is built on four core principles: (1) representing user requests directly as executable statements, covering all the functionality of the agent, (2) representing dialogues formally and succinctly to support accurate contextual semantic parsing, (3) standardizing types and interfaces to maximize reuse between agents, and (4) allowing multiple, independently-developed agents to be composed in a single virtual assistant. ThingTalk is developed as part of the Genie Framework that allows developers to quickly build transactional agents given a database and APIs. We compare ThingTalk to existing representations: SMCalFlow, SGD, TreeDST. Compared to the others, the ThingTalk design is both more general and more cost-effective. Evaluated on the MultiWOZ benchmark, using ThingTalk and associated tools yields a new state of the art accuracy of 79% turn-by-turn.

PaperPDFCode

Code

stanford-oval/genie-toolkit officialmentioned in paperpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Semantic Parsing

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SGD

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections