Papers › There is no fast lunch: an examination of the running speed of evolutionary algorithms...

There is no fast lunch: an examination of the running speed of evolutionary algorithms in several languages

3 Nov 2015arXiv:1511.01088archive 2025-07-28

Juan-J. Merelo, Pablo García-Sánchez, Mario García-Valdez, Israel Blancas

It is quite usual when an evolutionary algorithm tool or library uses a language other than C, C++, Java or Matlab that a reviewer or the audience questions its usefulness based on the speed of those other languages, purportedly slower than the aforementioned ones. Despite speed being not everything needed to design a useful evolutionary algorithm application, in this paper we will measure the speed for several very basic evolutionary algorithm operations in several languages which use different virtual machines and approaches, and prove that, in fact, there is no big difference in speed between interpreted and compiled languages, and that in some cases, interpreted languages such as JavaScript or Python can be faster than compiled languages such as Scala, making them worthy of use for evolutionary algorithm experimentation.

PaperPDFCode

Code

geneura-papers/2015-ea-languages officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Evolutionary Algorithms

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SPEED

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections