Papers › The Utility of "Even if..." Semifactual Explanation to Optimise Positive Outcomes

The Utility of "Even if..." Semifactual Explanation to Optimise Positive Outcomes

29 Oct 2023arXiv:2310.18937archive 2025-07-28

Eoin M. Kenny, Weipeng Huang

When users receive either a positive or negative outcome from an automated system, Explainable AI (XAI) has almost exclusively focused on how to mutate negative outcomes into positive ones by crossing a decision boundary using counterfactuals (e.g., \textit{"If you earn 2k more, we will accept your loan application"}). Here, we instead focus on \textit{positive} outcomes, and take the novel step of using XAI to optimise them (e.g., \textit{"Even if you wish to half your down-payment, we will still accept your loan application"}). Explanations such as these that employ "even if..." reasoning, and do not cross a decision boundary, are known as semifactuals. To instantiate semifactuals in this context, we introduce the concept of \textit{Gain} (i.e., how much a user stands to benefit from the explanation), and consider the first causal formalisation of semifactuals. Tests on benchmark datasets show our algorithms are better at maximising gain compared to prior work, and that causality is important in the process. Most importantly however, a user study supports our main hypothesis by showing people find semifactual explanations more useful than counterfactuals when they receive the positive outcome of a loan acceptance.

PaperPDFCode

Code

eoinkenny/semifactual_recourse_generation officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

2k

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

CounterfactualsFocus

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections