Papers › The Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Baseline: Discussing SVMs in Legal Text Classification

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Baseline: Discussing SVMs in Legal Text Classification

15 Sep 2021arXiv:2109.07234archive 2025-07-28

Benjamin Clavié, Marc Alphonsus

We aim to highlight an interesting trend to contribute to the ongoing debate around advances within legal Natural Language Processing. Recently, the focus for most legal text classification tasks has shifted towards large pre-trained deep learning models such as BERT. In this paper, we show that a more traditional approach based on Support Vector Machine classifiers reaches surprisingly competitive performance with BERT-based models on the classification tasks in the LexGLUE benchmark. We also highlight that error reduction obtained by using specialised BERT-based models over baselines is noticeably smaller in the legal domain when compared to general language tasks. We present and discuss three hypotheses as potential explanations for these results to support future discussions.

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Natural Language UnderstandingText Classificationtext-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Natural Language Understanding LexGLUE Optimised SVM Baseline ECtHR Task A 66.3 / 55.0 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Natural Language Understanding LexGLUE Optimised SVM Baseline ECtHR Task B 76.0 / 65.4 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Natural Language Understanding LexGLUE Optimised SVM Baseline EUR-LEX 65.7 / 49.0 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Natural Language Understanding LexGLUE Optimised SVM Baseline LEDGAR 88.0 / 82.6 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Natural Language Understanding LexGLUE Optimised SVM Baseline SCOTUS 74.4 / 64.5 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

AdamAttentionAttention DropoutBERTDense ConnectionsDropoutLayer NormalizationLinear LayerLinear Warmup With Linear DecayMulti-Head AttentionResidual ConnectionSoftmaxWeight DecayWordPiece

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections