Papers › The Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Baseline: Discussing SVMs in Legal Text Classification
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Baseline: Discussing SVMs in Legal Text Classification
Benjamin Clavié, Marc Alphonsus
We aim to highlight an interesting trend to contribute to the ongoing debate around advances within legal Natural Language Processing. Recently, the focus for most legal text classification tasks has shifted towards large pre-trained deep learning models such as BERT. In this paper, we show that a more traditional approach based on Support Vector Machine classifiers reaches surprisingly competitive performance with BERT-based models on the classification tasks in the LexGLUE benchmark. We also highlight that error reduction obtained by using specialised BERT-based models over baselines is noticeably smaller in the legal domain when compared to general language tasks. We present and discuss three hypotheses as potential explanations for these results to support future discussions.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Language Understanding | LexGLUE | Optimised SVM Baseline | ECtHR Task A | 66.3 / 55.0 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Natural Language Understanding | LexGLUE | Optimised SVM Baseline | ECtHR Task B | 76.0 / 65.4 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Natural Language Understanding | LexGLUE | Optimised SVM Baseline | EUR-LEX | 65.7 / 49.0 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Natural Language Understanding | LexGLUE | Optimised SVM Baseline | LEDGAR | 88.0 / 82.6 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Natural Language Understanding | LexGLUE | Optimised SVM Baseline | SCOTUS | 74.4 / 64.5 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections