Papers › The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Monte Carlo Simulations in A/B Testing
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Monte Carlo Simulations in A/B Testing
Márton Trencséni
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
This paper examines the use of Monte Carlo simulations to understand statistical concepts in A/B testing and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). We discuss the applicability of simulations in understanding false positive rates and estimate statistical power, implementing variance reduction techniques and examining the effects of early stopping. By comparing frequentist and Bayesian approaches, we illustrate how simulations can clarify the relationship between p-values and posterior probabilities, and the validity of such approximations. The study also references how Monte Carlo simulations can be used to understand network effects in RCTs on social networks. Our findings show that Monte Carlo simulations are an effective tool for experimenters to deepen their understanding and ensure their results are statistically valid and practically meaningful.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections