Papers › The SZ flux-mass (Y-M) relation at low halo masses: improvements with symbolic...

The SZ flux-mass (Y-M) relation at low halo masses: improvements with symbolic regression and strong constraints on baryonic feedback

5 Sep 2022arXiv:2209.02075archive 2025-07-28

Digvijay Wadekar, Leander Thiele, J. Colin Hill, Shivam Pandey, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, David N. Spergel, Miles Cranmer, Daisuke Nagai, Daniel Anglés-Alcázar, Shirley Ho, Lars Hernquist

Feedback from active galactic nuclei (AGN) and supernovae can affect measurements of integrated SZ flux of halos (Y_(SZ)) from CMB surveys, and cause its relation with the halo mass (Y_(SZ)-M) to deviate from the self-similar power-law prediction of the virial theorem. We perform a comprehensive study of such deviations using CAMELS, a suite of hydrodynamic simulations with extensive variations in feedback prescriptions. We use a combination of two machine learning tools (random forest and symbolic regression) to search for analogues of the Y-M relation which are more robust to feedback processes for low masses (M≲10¹⁴ h⁻¹ M_⊙); we find that simply replacing Y→Y(1+M_*/M_(gas)) in the relation makes it remarkably self-similar. This could serve as a robust multiwavelength mass proxy for low-mass clusters and galaxy groups. Our methodology can also be generally useful to improve the domain of validity of other astrophysical scaling relations. We also forecast that measurements of the Y-M relation could provide percent-level constraints on certain combinations of feedback parameters and/or rule out a major part of the parameter space of supernova and AGN feedback models used in current state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations. Our results can be useful for using upcoming SZ surveys (e.g., SO, CMB-S4) and galaxy surveys (e.g., DESI and Rubin) to constrain the nature of baryonic feedback. Finally, we find that the an alternative relation, Y-M_*, provides complementary information on feedback than Y-M

PaperPDFCode

Code

jaywadekar/scalingrelations_ml officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Symbolic Regression

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections