Papers › The star cluster formation history of the LMC

The star cluster formation history of the LMC

24 Jul 2012arXiv:1207.5576links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Holger Baumgardt, Genevieve Parmentier, Peter Anders, Eva K. Grebel

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The Large Magellanic Cloud is one of the nearest galaxies to us and is one of only few galaxies where the star formation history can be determined from studying resolved stellar populations. We have compiled a new catalogue of ages, luminosities and masses of LMC star clusters and used it to determine the age distribution and dissolution rate of LMC star clusters. We find that the frequency of massive clusters with masses M>5000 Msun is almost constant between 10 and 200 Myr, showing that the influence of residual gas expulsion is limited to the first 10 Myr of cluster evolution or clusters less massive than 5000 Msun. Comparing the cluster frequency in that interval with the absolute star formation rate, we find that about 15% of all stars in the LMC were formed in long-lived star clusters that survive for more than 10 Myr. We also find that the mass function of LMC clusters younger than 1 Gyr can be fitted by a power-law mass function with slope \alpha=-2.3, while older clusters follow a significantly shallower slope and interpret this is a sign of the ongoing dissolution of low-mass clusters. Our data shows that for ages older than 200 Myr, about 90% of all clusters are lost per dex of lifetime. The implied cluster dissolution rate is significantly faster than that based on analytic estimates and N-body simulations. Our cluster age data finally shows evidence for a burst in cluster formation about 1 Gyr ago, but little evidence for bursts at other ages.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Gabriel-p/mc-catalog mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections