Papers › Revenue vs. Welfare: A Comprehensive Analysis of Strategic Trade-offs in Online Food...

Revenue vs. Welfare: A Comprehensive Analysis of Strategic Trade-offs in Online Food Delivery Systems

21 Oct 2024arXiv:2410.16566links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Yukun Zhang, Qi Dong

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

This paper investigates the trade-off between short-term revenue generation and long-term social welfare optimization in online food delivery platforms. We first develop a static model that captures the equilibrium interactions among restaurants, consumers, and delivery workers, using Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) as a proxy for immediate performance. Building on this, we extend our analysis to a dynamic model that integrates evolving state variables,such as platform reputation and participant retention-to capture long-term behavior. By applying dynamic programming techniques, we derive optimal strategies that balance GMV maximization with social welfare enhancement. Extensive multi-agent simulations validate our theoretical predictions, demonstrating that while a GMV-focused approach yields strong initial gains, it ultimately undermines long-term stability. In contrast, a social welfare-oriented strategy produces more sustainable and robust outcomes. Our findings provide actionable insights for platform operators and policymakers seeking to harmonize rapid growth with long-term

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections