Papers › Dataset Summarization by K Principal Concepts

Dataset Summarization by K Principal Concepts

8 Apr 2021arXiv:2104.03952archive 2025-07-28

Niv Cohen, Yedid Hoshen

We propose the new task of K principal concept identification for dataset summarizarion. The objective is to find a set of K concepts that best explain the variation within the dataset. Concepts are high-level human interpretable terms such as "tiger", "kayaking" or "happy". The K concepts are selected from a (potentially long) input list of candidates, which we denote the concept-bank. The concept-bank may be taken from a generic dictionary or constructed by task-specific prior knowledge. An image-language embedding method (e.g. CLIP) is used to map the images and the concept-bank into a shared feature space. To select the K concepts that best explain the data, we formulate our problem as a K-uncapacitated facility location problem. An efficient optimization technique is used to scale the local search algorithm to very large concept-banks. The output of our method is a set of K principal concepts that summarize the dataset. Our approach provides a more explicit summary in comparison to selecting K representative images, which are often ambiguous. As a further application of our method, the K principal concepts can be used to classify the dataset into K groups. Extensive experiments demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.

PaperPDF

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClusteringImage Clustering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 Single-Noun Prior ARI 0.702 #21 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 Single-Noun Prior Accuracy 0.853 #21 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 Single-Noun Prior Backbone ViT-B-32 #21 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 Single-Noun Prior NMI 0.731 #21 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering CIFAR-10 Single-Noun Prior Train set Train+Test #21 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet-100 (TEMI Split) Single-Noun Prior ACCURACY 0.731 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet-100 (TEMI Split) Single-Noun Prior ARI 0.628 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet-100 (TEMI Split) Single-Noun Prior NMI 0.805 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet-200 Single-Noun Prior ACCURACY 0.598 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet-200 Single-Noun Prior ARI 0.486 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet-200 Single-Noun Prior NMI 0.749 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet-50 (TEMI Split) Single-Noun Prior ACCURACY 0.827 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet-50 (TEMI Split) Single-Noun Prior ARI 0.744 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering ImageNet-50 (TEMI Split) Single-Noun Prior NMI 0.847 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections