Papers › Topological approaches to knotted electric charge distributions

Topological approaches to knotted electric charge distributions

8 Sep 2020arXiv:2009.03958links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Max Lipton

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Consider a knot K in S³ with uniformly distributed electric charge. Whilst solutions to the Laplace equation in terms of Dirichlet integrals are readily available, it is still of theoretical and physical interest to understand the qualitative behavior of the potential, particularly with respect to critical points and equipotential surfaces. In this paper, we demonstrate how techniques from geometric topology can yield novel insights from the perspective of electrostatics. Specifically, we show that when the knot is sufficiently close to a planar projection, we prove a lower bound on the size of the critical set based on the projection's crossings, improving a 2019 result of the author. We then classify the equipotential surfaces of a charged knot distribution by tracking how the topology of the knot complement restricts the Morse surgeries associated to the critical points of the potential. keywords: Physical knot theory, electrostatics, Morse theory, dynamical systems, geometric topology, Cerf theory

PaperPDFCode

Code

ml2437/knot-potential-surfaces officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections