Papers › The power of prediction: spatiotemporal Gaussian process modeling for predictive...

The power of prediction: spatiotemporal Gaussian process modeling for predictive control in slope-based wavefront sensing

26 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.18275links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Jalo Nousiainen, Juha-Pekka Puska, Tapio Helin, Nuutti Hyvönen, Markus Kasper

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Time-delay error is a significant error source in adaptive optics (AO) systems. It arises from the latency between sensing the wavefront and applying the correction. Predictive control algorithms reduce the time-delay error, providing significant performance gains, especially for high-contrast imaging. However, the predictive controller's performance depends on factors such as the WFS type, the measurement noise, the AO system's geometry, and the atmospheric conditions. This work studies the limits of prediction under different imaging conditions through spatiotemporal Gaussian process models. The method provides a predictive reconstructor that is optimal in the least-squares sense, conditioned on the fixed times series of WFS data and our knowledge of the atmosphere. We demonstrate that knowledge is power in predictive AO control. With an SHS-based extreme AO instrument, perfect knowledge of Frozen Flow evolution (wind and Cn2 profile) leads to a reduction of the residual wavefront phase variance up to a factor of 3.5 compared to a non-predictive approach. If there is uncertainty in the profile or evolution models, the gain is more modest. Still, assuming that only effective wind speed is available (without direction) led to reductions in variance by a factor of 2.3. We also study the value of data for predictive filters by computing the experimental utility for different scenarios to answer questions such as: How many past data frames should the prediction filter consider, and is it always most advantageous to use the most recent data? We show that within the scenarios considered, more data consistently increases prediction accuracy. Further, we demonstrate that given a computational limitation on how many past frames we can use, an optimized selection of n past frames leads to a 10-15% additional improvement in RMS over using the n latest consecutive frames of data.

PaperPDFCode

Code

jnousi/ST-GP4AO officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections